With watch brands like Ball starting to use 904L stainless steel, taking the bragging rights away from Rolex, we thought now is the perfect time to explore the differences between 316L and 904L – at least when it comes to watches.
The industry standard stainless steel is 316L. In addition to watches, this alloy is also commonly used in the food industry, the medical field, and a wide variety of water and marine applications. You may see some watch brands refer to 316L as surgical grade steel or marine grade steel. Its popularity in these areas comes from the properties which make it resistant to rust and corrosion. 904L steel takes the resistance to corrosion up a notch.
Rolex 904L Steel:
In the watch community, 904L is largely regarded as being a Rolex thing. Even the Wikipedia entry for 904L stainless steel has been edited to include a Rolex mention (well done, Rolex!):
“In 1985 Rolex became the first wristwatch manufacturer to utilize 904L grade steel in its watches. Rolex chose to use this variety of steel because it takes a higher polish than other grades of steel and provides greater corrosion resistance, though it does not machine as well and requires specialized equipment to be properly modified into the required shapes.”
Perhaps Rolex deserves credit for being recognized as the first brand to sell watches with cases made out of 904L steel, but this has led many to think that 904L was a Rolex invention or a material exclusive to Rolex.
It could also be due to the verbiage around the term Oystersteel, which Rolex defines as:
“…a steel alloy specific to the brand. Oystersteel belongs to the 904L steel family, which is particularly resistant to corrosion and acquires an exceptional sheen when polished.” –source
Notice how it says it is an alloy specific to Rolex? Rolex has another blurb on their brand history page that claims they use their own alloy of 904L steel:
“Rolex’s steel watches are manufactured from Rolex’s own 904L alloy, known as “Oystersteel” from 2018.”
This is interesting because one would assume an alloy is determined by the properties that compose it. In other words, if it is “Rolex’s own 904L alloy” then wouldn’t changing the composition mean that it is no longer pure 904L steel?
Is 904L steel a precious metal?
To say Rolex is serious about their 904L steel is an understatement. Their advertisements have gone as far as calling it a precious metal (gold and platinum are precious metals).
Like the vintage Rolex ad above, several areas of their current website (as of 4/2021) also compares 904L steel to precious metals…
“Most commonly used in high-technology and in the aerospace and chemical industries, 904L steels are comparable to precious metals for their anti-corrosion properties and acquire an exceptional sheen once polished.” –source
And again here:
“904L steels are commonly used in high-technology and in the aerospace and chemical industries. Their excellent anti-corrosion properties are comparable to those of precious metals. Rolex masters in-house the entire manufacturing process for its 904L steel watch components.” –source
Ah, so that explains how a stainless steel watch can cost over $10,000…
Rolex and their use of 904L steel has largely gone unchallenged in the watch industry for decades. Now, as brands scramble find any competitive edge in a saturated market, we’re seeing other watch companies start to jump on the 904L train. But is 904L really that much better?
316L VS 904L Steel Composition:
We’re watch enthusiasts, not metallurgists, but the chart below sums up the main property differences between 316L and 904L steel:
316L Steel |
904L Steel |
|
Carbon | 0.035% max | 0.2% max |
Chromium | 16-18% | 19-23% |
Copper | 0 | 1-2% |
Iron | Balance | Balance |
Molybdenum | 2-3% | 4-5% |
Manganese | 2% max | 2% max |
Nickel | 10-12% | 23-28% |
Phosphorus | 0.45% | 0.03% max |
Silicon | .75% max | 1% max |
Hardness (Rockwell) |
95 | 70-90 |
Hardness (Brinell) |
217 | 150 |
Sources: Information was found in datasheets here and here, as well as on wikipedia here and here. Hardness was found here and here. |
Main Differences:
As you can see, the biggest difference when it comes to using 316L/904L for steel case and bracelet material in watches, is that 904L has a higher percentage of nickel and chromium, as well as the addition of copper.
904L also has an advantage when it comes to corrosion resistance, thanks to the copper and extra molybdenum:
“The addition of copper to this grade gives it corrosion resistant properties superior to the conventional chrome nickel stainless steels, in particular to sulphuric, phosphoric and acetic acids. However, there is limited use with hydrochloric acids. It also has a high resistance to pitting in chloride solutions, a high resistance to both crevice and stress corrosion cracking. Alloy 904L performs better than other austenitic stainless steels due to the higher alloying of nickel and molybdenum.” –source
The same resource also points out that 904L is non-magnetic in all conditions, an excellent quality to have when it comes these extremely sensitive little machines!
Does 904L cost more than 316L steel?
In our search for this answer, it became clear that pricing information on 316L is more readily available, as well as scrap prices and overall availability. 316L appears to be more widely used and readily available in various sizes and quantities. 904L is obtainable, but there is far less pricing information out there.
From what we gathered, based on comparing roll, sheet and tubing prices on Alibaba, Amazon and eBay, the 904L steel prices were approximately 2-3 times greater than 316L. The difference in price may not be significant to the amount needed to produce watches (compared to building material), which could also explain the below $2,000 USD price point of the new Ball Watch Roadmaster Icebreaker in 904L.
However, when it comes to manufacturing watch components, most factories are set-up for working with 316L steel. Does using raw 904L steel require a difference process or different machinery? It is said that Rolex has invested heavily in developing machines that allow them to work with 904L in-house, this statement from their 904L marketing video (see above) backs it up:
“…a steel so incredibly difficult to machine, that special equipment had to be built. Only one watchmaker would consider using it: Rolex.”
It is the watch industry after all, so this claim may just be the result of marketing smoke and mirrors. According to this site (which proclaims to be the leading online publication for the Materials Science community), 904L is no more difficult to work with than 316L:
“Grade 904L stainless steels are high purity steels with low sulfur content. They can be machined using any standard methods.”
Wow.
Should I buy a watch with 316L or 904L steel?
The biggest deciding factor in purchasing a watch made from 316L vs 904L steel could be if you have reactions to nickel touching your skin. Although, technically 316L has nickel too, so titanium is probably the best choice for nickel allergies. Likewise, if you prefer a shinier finish on your steel watches, the higher chromium in 904L will likely be more attractive to you.
Quick FAQs / TL;DR
There is so much misinformation being spread by other watch blogs and sellers on the topic of Rolex 904L steel. Let’s clarify some things:
Is Rolex the only watch brand to use 904L steel?
No.
Is 904L steel a Rolex invention?
No.
Was Rolex the first watch brand to use 904L steel?
Yes, as far as we know, but there are a lot of “firsts” in the watch industry that aren’t actually firsts. As for Rolex being the first on record or the first to market their use of 904L, yes, they were first (circa 1985).
Update: There are comments below stating that Omega was first to use 904L in their Ploprof diver (circa 1972), if that is true, then, in addition to the Wikipedia entry quoted above, Omega should be contesting this statement posted on Rolex’s history page: “In 1985, Rolex became the first watchmaking brand to use this steel from the 904L family for its cases.”
What was the first Rolex watch to use 904L steel?
Sea-Dweller.
Why did Rolex switch to 904L steel?
They claimed it was because the threading on the caseback of 316L was capable of corroding, which would allow water to get into the case and pose a potential issue to the folks using the watches as actual tools. Have you ever seen tiny rust spots around the edge of the case when you take the back off? This is why.
Is 904L steel better than 316L steel?
It depends on the person wearing the watch, where they are wearing it and how they are wearing it.
Is 904L steel harder than 316L?
No.
Does 904L look shinier than 316L?
Yes.
Is 904L easier to polish?
It sure seems like it. It is known (at least on our side of the watch industry aka pre-owned) that Rolex watches using 904L steel clean up nicely after being refinished. This could be due to the shinier finish 904L steel gives off, but also keep in mind that a watch’s ability to clean up nicely has almost everything to do with the design and flow of the finish. For example, an all satin Oyster bracelet is 10 times easier to brush out with a Bergeon wheel and restore to like new condition than an Omega Seamaster bracelet with mixed satin/polished links the require multiple steps of taping/refinishing. For that reason, many watch sellers will quickly clean up a Submariner or GMT-Master II, but will leave an SMP as-is.
Is 904L steel worth the extra cost?
There shouldn’t be a huge difference in cost associated with individual watches made from 904L steel. If the cost of a 904L steel watch is significantly higher, it’s probably because of something else, not the steel itself.
Bonus: What is STEELINOX?
In French, the word for “stainless” is inox or inoxydable. In metallurgical terms, inox steel is stainless steel. “Steelinox” is simply the Rolex way to say it, duh!
What is your experience with watches in 316L vs 904L? Comment below…
Thank you for reading! If you enjoyed this article about the different types of stainless steel used in watchmaking, check out the SS watches in our store or see some of the latest editions below:
Rolex was not the first watch brand to use 904L stainless steel. That honour, as so many that Rolex claims for itself, goes to Omega. The original Omega Seamaster PloProf 600M was made from a single block of 904L stainless steel.
SPQR, can you cite a source for this information? I am unable to confirm that the PloProf was made of 904L steel. All information I have seen simply refers to the case as being made of stainless steel; I have seen no reference to grade.
Read this article they don’t talk a lot about the 904l steel block but… https://monochrome-watches.com/omega-and-the-ploprof-research-programme-innovation-in-professional-dive-watches-incl-pioneering-use-of-904l-steel-for-watches/
SPQR is correct. The PloProf was the first to be made from 904L (called Uranus steel back then), but Rolex was the first to take it to market.
https://monochrome-watches.com/omega-and-the-ploprof-research-programme-innovation-in-professional-dive-watches-incl-pioneering-use-of-904l-steel-for-watches/
As an Engineer and a machinist I can tell you that 904 is slightly tougher to machine but its only the cutting tips NOT the machinery that changes, so thats a con. All Stainless Steels cut fairly easy in comparison to say Titanium. Also, if you consider where the average person will wear a watch 904 is hardly required, with 316 temperatures above 60 degrees increase the chances of corrosion, but for most people its… Read more »
As the ex-technical manager at a stainless plant it’s all very simple. It’s a polishing issue which is what jewelry is all about. 904L takes a better polish.Oddly, wearers will also find that the “black sweat” sometimes associated with wearing a 316 bracelet is less pronounced when wearing 904L. Are we sure we’re talking about 316L – not much welding going on? Also, the P level given above for 904L should read the same as… Read more »
You beat me to it but with the polishing but 316 ss still polishes up nicely but using 904l should not increase cost of the watch more than one using 316 and the only benefit is with people actual using during dives…lets be honest few Rolex owners dive with them. There are other quality watch makers using 904L and selling them for a few $1000 unlike Rolex. But Rolex owners need something to justify their… Read more »
By my understanding it was the Omega Ploprof that used 904L steel first in the 1970s after Comex – the french commercial diving company used it for diving bells.
And now Steinhart use it in the Ocean 39 premium 904 for less then 800 Euro.I would like to know how much easier is 904L to scratch since its hardness is somewhat lower than 316L does it make a huge difference in scratch resistance ?As a knife collector i know for knives a HRC of 95 (316L) is way better than 70 HRC Also i feel it should state in the list how hard Rolex… Read more »
For measuring non hardenable stainless steel, the Rockwell scale is HRB not HRC. For your reference, HRB 98.1 = HRC 20.3. In the 904L case, its HRB 90 hardness is so soft that it has no HRC equivalent.
Knife edges usually has hardness levels of HRC 50 to HRC 65.
The comparison chart has also stated that the Brinell hardness is only 150, double confirmed that that 904L is a very soft material.
OK, first of all Omega were the first watch firm to utilise 904L stainless steel, not Rolex. Omega Seamaster Proplof 600m had that honour. Secondly, not all is perfect with 904L as it’s hardness and durability can be significantly lower than 316L which is the reason 316L is still preferred for professional dive watches. The 904L sales pitch is all about marketing. I’ve never had corrosion on any of my 316L dive watches, some of… Read more »
Great post and I fully agree, The main reason why Rolex uses 904L, in my view, is the name. 904 seems almost three times harder, better, tougher, or whatever, than 316. If 904L steel was named 206L, Rolex would stay away.
Obviously you haven’t worn one, exposed to every possible corrosive (not to mention constant Sweat) for half a century.
You don’t know what you’re talking about, and my direct, personal and irrefutable experience proves it.
Face it, you’re just cheap ~
What do you mean you worn one yo every possible corrosive? 316ss has excellent corrosion resistance 904L has slightly more molybdenum and chromium making a hair more resistance. 316 will not corrode around constant sweat for centuries, what exactly are you doing putting yourself in constant sweat? One benefit to 904L is it does polish slightly better probably why Rolex uses to dupe buyers into paying the inflated pieces with a shiny piece. There are… Read more »
I own one of the newer BALL watches made with 904L and truly enjoy the ease of polishing and the length of time the steel holds its luster. My training as a toolmaker was useful in making my purchasing decision because I already knew that 904L was super easy to polish and that the slightly softer (90 -vs- 95) hardness would not make a difference in scratch acquisitions. Now it’s years later and people still… Read more »
I have a gorgeous Rolex Datejust ( 1989 ) 2 tone gold and a Mint Ball Engineer II Pioneer Automatic Chronometer Silver faced watch and it’s Fantastic . The Rolex, because it is a gold two tone, has more pizzazz although both are shiny because of the 904L stainless steel. Although I do love the Rolex, I love the Ball watch more and I wear it more. I just like it more., I think perhaps… Read more »
Very nice explanation. Though the question “Is 904L harder than 316L?” should have been answered… no, its softer. From the specs in the article, it might be a lot softer…95 vs 70-90 … 90 vs 95 is probably not a noticeable difference…. but 70 or 80 could result in watches that are much easier to blemish. Any sense in the actual hardness of the 904L used by BALL and ROLEX?
I know Rolex get banged and marked up a lot when using every day. But Rolex service makes them look almost new. But anything with 904L will likely look more banged up than a 316L with the same hard use. Depends on if you are using your “Professional” watch at a desk only or are using it as it was originally intended—corral will easily scratch a Submariner. But it is a watch, i.e. a tool… Read more »
I see a bit of yellowish tone with 904L as opposed to 316L. Again, a bit like comparing nickel with chrome – but I don’t think anyone could tell right off- except a metallurgist or the person doing the buffing. I have never been in a situation where my 316L steel watch was being compromised.
Thanks for the post, and comments, it’s all part of the game, what ever tickles your fancy. But knowledge is key.